Continuing Professional Development (CPD) requirements for Occupational Therapy registration



New Zealand and Australia both require Occupational therapists to complete ongoing training as part of maintaining competency as a registered therapist. Both Systems require OTs to be nationally registered and to prove ongoing competence to the board on request. This competence is measured by the training and education opportunities that the therapist has undertaken throughout the year.  Both systems have an expectation that therapists will maintain standards and stay up to date with latest technology and practice by attending ongoing education. 


With a wide choice of ongoing education opportunities available in relation to AT, the education team at Permobil are confident that our clinical education courses meet the updated registration standard. For Australians the CPD hours have been reduced to 20 hours as of Dec 1st, 2019. It is important for therapists registered in both countries to keep up to date with the requirements their board imposes.  Audits for previous years will still require you to meet that year`s requirements.

I recently had a conversation with a senior OT / Team leader who was asking about our education opportunities for her staff. She articulated she had previously attended “CPD trainings” that did not offer her any professional development as were not pitched at a level she felt met the course description. She reported that she was happy to send her staff to workshops with our team as she felt they provided good skills and learning opportunities for her staff. She expressed her frustration at releasing staff to find that the course she sent them on did not actually benefit their roles.

An increasing number of services are working in a billable hour’s models, with national insurance schemes in place in both NZ and AU. This can put increased pressure on income generation and taking time out for education is not always seen as a priority. However, CPD needs to be given value, partly due to it being a board requirement but mostly because it helps us grow and become better therapists by setting goals and pushing ourselves to constantly grow.

How do we make CPD work for us? Set yourself clear goals and look for training opportunities that will address your goals. Read course and workshop descriptions to see if they include skills or information that will assist your practice. Talk to educators about your goals and needs if you`re not sure that it’s the right workshop for you. Talk to colleagues that have attended the training already if it`s been previously run and how they found it, time is precious, and you want to be getting the training you expect!  Just attending a workshop or webinar whilst a great way of meeting your CPD hours is not the sole intention of CPD. How will you implement what you have learned into practice? How has the training enhanced your knowledge and work role? What do you need to do next? More important than the certificate you may receive is holding onto any notes you have written at the training, better still a small reflection on what you have learned, how you will use it to improve practice and where to next.

2020 Permobil education will continue to provide educational opportunities around Australia and New Zealand. We have a range of new and existing workshops that will be run face to face around Australasia. Watch out online as we will be releasing these new additions very soon.

We will also continue to develop our webinar platform for more product specific training and of course our weekly blog! Over the next few weeks Sergei and Mal will be sharing some exciting and informative real-life experiences through our blogs and Rachel and I will return next year with the clinical blogs.

On behalf of the clinical education team and Permobil we would like to thank you for your continued support of our Blog this year and wish you and your families safe and happy holidays!


Rachel and Tracee-lee

To pommel or not to pommel, a look at adduction points of control


Historically known as a Pommel or an Abductor, the new ISO terminology to describe this product parameter is a medial thigh support. This support can be independent of the seating (attached to the seat pan of the mobility base) or built into the cushion through the contours of the cushion itself.

Abduction and adduction of the hip joint are a continuum; neutral positioning is when the knee joint and hip bones are in line and symmetrical. If the knee is medial (Knees together touching) the hip joint is adducted. If the knee joint is lateral to the hip joint (Knees apart), the hip is abducted.



We frequently refer to the sitting position being as neutral as possible and we know if the wheelchair is too wide this has a negative impact on the shoulder joint for self-propulsion. So why do we use medial thigh supports in seating? When do we consider its use? What are the disadvantages of this type of support? We also know that the larger the base of support the more stability gained, abduction increases our seated base of support thus can be a preferred position. Body dimensions may also require a more abducted seated position, so why not sit everyone abducted?

In addition to forcing self-propulsion from a vulnerable position (in shoulder abduction), the increase in the width of the seating may also decrease accessibility in some environments. The clinical reasoning process needs to consider the hip ranges of motion established in a MAT assessment, tone patterns, proximal stability of the pelvis, and users’ functional goals to determine the seating parameters. What kind of supports are required based on the capacity of someone to gain functional support and stability?


                                  Abduction                                                             Adduction















If a femur is positioned in more abduction than there is passive range, the impact on the pelvis will be seen with the pelvis rotating in the same direction to enable the femoral position.  This is commonly seen when a non-reducible wind sweeping position is not accommodated. Wind sweeping is the tendency for both limbs to sweep to one side – one hip will be abducted and the other adducted.

Longitudinal hip surveillance studies have provided us invaluable information on hip migration, causations, high risk group identification and resulted in guidelines such as - which is an excellent resource.




The resource explains “Progressive displacement can result in asymmetric pressure that may deform the femoral head and or acetabulum (also termed acetabular dysplasia). Hip dysplasia may lead to degeneration of articular cartilage and pain25. Problems with limited range of movement and pain can interfere with function, ability to be positioned, hygiene and personal care. In a large subset of children the progressive displacement can develop into dislocation of one or both hips (Cooke et al, 1989).”

For anyone working or caring for young children with Cerebral Palsy and mobility impairment, potential risk groups have been identified and are encouraged to be referred to a hip surveillance program. Seating positioning recommendations for these children is likely to include some abduction for either chair or bed positioning.

One thing a pommel is not is a load bearing surface or a safety stop! When someone does not have the hip flexion ranges to sit with the hips bent at 90 degrees they are likely to “slide” out of the seating as they try to open their hip angle to meet the seat-to-back angle of the seating. I have been involved in cases like this where the support people then ask us to make the seat more ramped – based on the anti-thrust seat concept they may have had as a child or seen others utilising. If they do not have the range to sit in a 90 degree seat-to-back angle, raising the front of the cushion will only make it more difficult to maintain a flexed hip. They will continue to attempt to open this angle by sliding into posterior pelvic tilt (PPT) – see my previous blog for more on that.

If there is a pommel fitted this is often all that is holding the individual in the seating if they don’t have the capacity to bend their hips enough. When doing custom seating I would often have support workers or carers asking for this pommel to be larger as it stopped the user from sliding out. If we are prescribing AT, It is part of our job as a therapist to be able to articulate and educate what the points of control are and how they can benefit someone’s positioning and ultimately their function.


             A Dreamline Swing-Down Abductor Pommel

So, what is a pommel? What point of control is it addressing? The purpose of a pommel or leg troughs in a cushion are solely intended to reduce the level of adduction. The ongoing implication for adduction includes instability, increased difficulties with personal care and hygiene tasks, increased pressure risk at the knees and of significant concern, increased risk of posterior hip dislocation especially for those individuals who have never had opportunity of the hip fossa fully developing through walking and weight bearing.

When considering a pommel or a support to decrease adduction, there are several factors to consider. Should it be integrated into the cushion? This is likely to be determined by factors such as transfer style. Should it be removable? What environments is the user in requiring support? Can the support workers easily fit and remove it as required? How high is it? Generally, it does not need to protrude above the user’s thighs. What angulation can be achieved? Can it be adjusted for ongoing needs?

Do you want to know more about product parameters, MAT or functional seated positioning? Permobil offer a range of workshops including practical hands-on learning opportunities, blogs, workshops and webinars. Don’t hesitate to reach out to us for further information! Follow our blog to be the first to find out more details on our 2020 training opportunities which will be released very shortly!


Tracee-lee Maginnity




Seating Assessments  - The What, Where, When and Why





It still amazes me when I am involved with a complex seating assessment and the user advises that this is the first time they have had a MAT assessment done or they haven’t had this type of assessment since they were a child. As I heard this again last week from an active full time wheelchair user with significant non-reducible asymmetries, I decided to talk about the MAT component of the seating assessment this week!

Are you doing MAT assessments as part of a seating assessment? Are you a wheelchair user that has never heard of a MAT assessment? This week we will take you through a seating assessment and discuss the what, where, when and why of a MAT assessment.

Getting Started



This flowchart is part of the online workshop for spinal seating NSW – there is a link at the end of the blog to the online course

What is involved in a mobility and seating assessment? If someone’s mobility impairment requires them to complete all mobility and activities of daily living from the wheelchair they should have a seating assessment. The seating assessment will include the assessor discussing the mobility needs, documenting historical information in relation to the impairment, looking at and measuring any existing wheelchair and seating, looking at the home environment, discussing goals, discussing other environments, the MAT and taking measurements.

Seating assessments are usually completed by Occupational Therapists or Physiotherapists. For some funding systems you need to see a therapist who has met the funder’s minimum requirements through a competency pathway, others may state an OT or PT, in which case you should look for a therapist who is experienced in Wheelchair and seating prescription.

A seating assessment should identify postural and functional goals and then taking a biomechanical approach, identify how to support the posture to meet the user’s goals. Both the therapist and the user should wear loose, comfortable clothing that will not restrict movement. For best outcome, a seating assessment should be done prior to the identification of potential trial equipment. The trial parameters will be identified at this assessment and then appropriate seating. (IMAGE A)

What is a MAT?

MAT is an acronym for Mechanical Assessment Tool. When completed in full it has 3 parts to it, the first part is the seated evaluation where the therapist will identify the posture whilst sitting in the existing chair. This part of the assessment can assist in identification of any postural issues currently being experienced in the existing system. The therapist will potentially feel your hip bones to ascertain how symmetrical you are sitting as well as making notes about how you are sitting and about your current equipment. It is good to articulate what is liked and not liked about your current equipment during this process. The therapist wants to determine what’s working and what could be improved so it’s good to talk about any difficulties being experienced with the current wheelchair or seating. Any places or tasks are identified that could be completed but are limited due to the existing seating or mobility device.



The next part of the assessment requires a supine evaluation (Supine means lying on back). This is around identifying the amount of movement in hip, knee and ankle joints. Essentially, they are looking at the capacity the body has to be in a seated position. The assessor will passively move legs into positions required for sitting and feel for tone and how much range of movement there is. It doesn’t matter if you can’t move your legs, the therapist will do it for you. They may measure this movement using a special ruler called a goniometer (Image 5, of goniometer ) or they may just take note of the movement range.

The 3rd part of the assessment is the simulation or the unsupported sitting component. This involves mocking up the ideal seated position based on the information from the first two parts of the assessment and taking measurements in this position for any new seating that may be required. This assessment is more crucial for people that are unable to sit without support as this will determine what and how much support the seating in the wheelchair needs to provide. The measurements are taken once the positioning has been determined to ensure the sizing will appropriately support needs. (Image 6 MEASURMENTS IMAGE)

When is a MAT done?

A MAT will usually be done prior to trialling a new wheelchair or seating system. It may also be done as part of a review of existing equipment to assist in determining if that equipment is still meeting needs. A MAT can assist in determining if there have been any physical changes in posture or range from the last time the seating or mobility base was prescribed. Completion of a MAT will assist in identification of the correct supports so it should be completed prior to the identification of a trial wheelchair.

Where is a MAT done?

A MAT assessment should be done on a plinth (Treatment bed) this surface is firm so enables the therapist to determine the movements fluidity and range without the impact of a soft surface hiding the movements. This is why seating clinics will often get clients to attend an assessment at their facility prior to setting up a trial at home. Some modifications to the MAT process may be necessary if completing in a person’s home or community setting without access to a plinth; If the seating assessment is completed in the community the therapist may bring a massage table. If done on an air alternating mattress, consider putting it to transfer mode or deflating it. If appropriate the assessment can sometimes be carried out on the floor.


Why is a MAT done?

By biomechanical design, people are not built for sitting, our skeletal system would have very different shaped sitting bones if so. A MAT is completed to assist in understanding the capacity of a person’s seated position. If postural tendencies and reductions in range are not considered they can have a negative impact on positioning, pressure risk and function. By working out what position is optimal, the required supports can be identified to support that position and then replicated with a trial of potential equipment.

To effectively identify seating requirements, points of control and required supports, it is best practice to perform a MAT as part of the seating assessment.

If you are a therapist and work with users to identify mobility and seating equipment, then keep your MAT skills up to date! There is an online course you can do here:

We offer several hands-on workshops and education opportunities to assist in learning more about MAT or building confidence in skills to complete this assessment.

Contact to find out more information. Our education team is also happy to discuss any learning opportunities or clinical dilemmas. 



Oceania Seating Symposium 2019 – A recap of the conference





Last week over 450 delegates from all around the world gathered in Melbourne for the 2019 Oceania Seating Symposium. Permobil was there as a proud Platinum Sponsor. The International Seating Symposium first started in Vancouver in the early 1980s, alternating between USA and Canada each year. The symposium has continued to grow and has assisted the development of partner conferences in Ireland, Brazil, Asia and now Oceania!

It’s now a premier meeting attracting dedicated clinicians, researchers, manufacturers, and others who work in the area of seating and positioning, and wheeled mobility.



The first Oceania Seating Symposium (OSS) was held in Rotorua, New Zealand and was hosted by Seating to Go, a leading assessment and education provider.

This year was Australia’s first time to host OSS at the Melbourne Cricket Ground, and it was a huge success by all accounts.

Melanie Tran is a university student and UX designer for Ability Made and Hire Up. She opened the 3 day event with a Keynote on “How Opportunities Can Be Created Through Design and Technology”.

Melanie is an eloquent speaker who provided an insightful presentation, drawing on her experiences



Melanie was followed by renowned Paediatric therapist Lisa Kenyon, who presented the latest research and shared some therapist conceptions (or should I say misconceptions) on accessing powered mobility. I hope she challenged paediatric therapists through her case studies of very young and complex children to enable more children to gain access to independent movement opportunities. 

Kelly Waugh from USA presented several papers and workshops over the 3 days that were very well attended. I attended her head and neck positioning workshop where we were reminded about determining points of control in relation to the centre of mass and the importance of understanding these concepts and the bio-mechanical influences of specific joints.



Permobil Clinical Education specialist Rachel Fabiniak presented two clinical workshops, one on alternative drive access and another on upper extremities and manual wheelchair propulsion.

The sessions were in high demand and very popular. Attendees were taking up every available seat!

Our education team also presented on seating and powered Active Reach on the product education stage, as well as having lots of clinical discussions on our expo stands where the therapists had an opportunity to get hands-on with a range of products.



rtunity to get hands-on with a range of products.



Permobil Clinical Education specialist Rachel Fabiniak presented two clinical workshops, one on alternative drive access and another on upper extremities and manual wheelchair propulsion.

The sessions were in high demand and very popular. Attendees were taking up every available seat!

Our education team also presented on seating and powered Active Reach on the product education stage, as well as having lots of clinical discussions on our expo stands where the therapists had an opportunity to get hands-on with a range of products.



There was a great range of topics presented this year and too many highlights! As well as all the learning opportunities, OSS also provided networking opportunities. The conference dinner gave attendees a chance to get together socially.

A local indigenous dance group gave a beautiful performance and Mal Turnbull warmed the crowd up as the evening’s MC. A very tasty dinner was followed by dancing and it was great to see everyone have a chance to enjoy the evening.

It was also great talking to the therapists about their experiences at OSS. Everyone I spoke to felt it had been a very valuable learning opportunity, with more than a few saying it was the best conference they had been to. Therapists came from all over Australia and New Zealand to attend and it was great to meet one of the scholarship recipients – a rural therapist who was selected by the committee after writing about how her practice would benefit from attending.

The supplier expo was very busy! We really enjoyed showing everyone the range we had on stand and the feedback around our new products was positive and constructive. Therapists got a sneak peak of the Pushtracker E2 in action with the SmartDrive. This officially launches today so if you couldn’t make it to OSS and didn’t see the webinar, get in touch with your local dealer who now has all the details!








Seating and Positioning – Achieving the right posture



This week’s blog comes to you from the sky as we head to Melbourne, for Australia’s first ever Oceania Seating Symposium! We are excited to have this conference here in Australia. If you’re attending, please stop by and say hello. Rachel has two clinical presentations and we are both also presenting on the product stage. I will share a few conference highlights next week but for this week’s discussion we will continue with a seating theme.

Posterior Pelvic Tilt (PPT) and associated kyphosis are one of the most common and avoidable seating positions. When we talk about the pelvis being the foundation in sitting, we are referring to supporting the pelvis in a neutral position, but is this all about the cushion? … yes and no! The cushion can assist in maintaining a neutral position but if there is a tendency for a reducible PPT the primary point of control is the posterior aspect of the pelvis, so essentially comes from the backrest. Before we delve deeper into this point of control lets look at some common causations of PPT based on the equipment provided and how a cushion can assist or work against the goal.

Identifying some common causations of PPT

The most common causation in an equipment induced PPT is when the seat depth is too long. This is a crucial measurement. If it is longer than the femoral length (Popliteal to behind Glutes with neutral as possible pelvis) the user has no choice but to roll back into PPT to gain back support. Think about your big deep comfy couch. This is often designed with a long seat depth. Think about the functional activities we do on couch…its more about relaxation. When we sit on this deep seat length and we can’t sit back any further whilst still having our knees in a flexed position, our pelvis must roll back into a PPT for us to have contact on the backrest. The same happens in a wheelchair seat.


The other time we frequently see PPT is when we have not accommodated shortened hamstrings or reduced hip flexion. In these instances the seat to back angle and/or the hanger angle of the leg rests need to meet the users needs and postural requirements, if these do not meet the range of motion (ROM) identified within the MAT assessment of the user there is often a constant postural battle with PPT as the consequence.

The Cushion

As discussed earlier the seat depth is crucial and as such the cushion is also important. We need to ensure that the cushion depth and placement match the user’s measurements. When considering the product parameters of the cushion we need to pay attention to the Ischial well and ledge. In some modular cushions there are some IT adjustment options (where the ledge is located and how deep the well is) ideally you want the ledge to be just in front of the ITs to assist in reducing them from rolling back towards PPT. The depth of the well and the materials in the well also need to be considered in relation to the positioning and support requirements. Placement of a pelvic belt will also assist in supporting the pelvis and are part of the point of control solution.

So, what happens when you have an end user who has an appropriate seat depth, a reducible PPT and you have determined the ROM is appropriate. Where is the point of control to correct this positioning and support a neutral pelvis?

Just as our back is not flat, the contours of the backrest should be such that they support the end users shape and postural tendencies. In paediatric seating we may be further trying to assist in the development of the natural curves within the spine.

If the wheelchair is for occasional use, an upholstery backrest may meet the goals and needs of the user, however if the wheelchair is used for all mobility or functional tasks it is essential to consider alternatives. For some users this may mean a tension adjustable upholstery backrest which can be adjusted to provide support as required however for many a rigid backrest will be needed to provide the best support. Assessors and prescribers need to be aware of how to appropriately provide support with a rigid backrest to assist in the clinical reasoning process. For some backrests we can adjust the angle of support within the mounting bracketry and if the user has trunk innovation this may be enough. For some users, a pelvic block cut from a firm foam and placed under the backrest padding can make a significant difference. Other options have bespoke adjustments such as the Boa system within the Acta backrest, which uses a reel and cable system to provide supportive contours. If more contouring is required consideration of a customisable backrest where you can build a pelvic block into the backrest such as using the BAC system with the Dreamline backs may provide the contouring and positioning chosen. Essentially it is dependant on the degree of impairment and overall presentation on how aggressive and what type of supports are required. In all instances however we are trying to provide a rear low force that assists in pushing the pelvis from PPT towards neutral as the primary point of control and then provide opposite and equal forces to maintain using the cushion and pelvic belt.

If you want more info on seating and positioning, please contact us. We have a range of workshops to assist you in your learning goals.






Proximal Stability – Distal Ability


In the world of therapy, we often hear the phrase, “Proximal Stability before Distal Ability”. Essentially, this is a principle of movement and relates to the development of core strength and stability at the trunk to promote movement and based on foundation concepts of kinematic chains.

The concept of kinematic chains was initially proposed by Franz Reuleaux, a mechanical engineer, in 1875. (F.Reuleaux, Kinematics of Machinery,1875). 80 years later, Dr. Arthur Steindler expanded upon Reauleax’s work and applied the concept to the human body and movement. Dr Steindler, MD, orthopaedic clinician and educator proposed that the extremities are rigid, overlapping segments in series and he defined the kinetic chain as a “combination of several successively arranged joints constituting a complex motor unit.” (Ellenbecker TS, Davies GJ. Closed kinetic chain exercise: a comprehensive guide to multiple joint exercise. Human Kinetics; 2001)


The human kinetic chain refers to the interrelated groups of body segments, connecting joints, and muscles working together and the portion of the spine to which they connect. Optimal movement requires structural alignment of the skeletal system and joints, and neuromuscular control. Impairment within any of these systems can affect movement. The upper kinetic chain consists of the fingers, wrists, forearms, elbows, upper arms, shoulders, shoulder blades, and spinal column. we must first have a stable chain of muscles that run from our core muscles to our shoulder to our elbow, wrist and then to our fingers.

We will now focus on the upper kinetic chain and the provision of assistive technologies to support proximal stability and consequently increase functional positioning in a wheelchair. So how can we support or create proximal stability and enable increased functional positioning?



For wheelchair users we need to first consider the foundation of the spinal column in a seated position, the pelvis. Correction of a reducible pelvic obliquity or rotation is one of the ways we can promote a stable base of support. When completing a seating assessment, it is important to consider the pelvis position in all planes and use sound clinical reasoning to identify the points of control. This in turn helps us identify the required product parameters of the seating which will assist in identifying appropriate seating options. 

Seat depth and width also need to be considered in order to gain proximal stability. If the seat is too wide the pelvis may lose lateral stability, too short or too long and it may be difficult to maintain a neutral pelvis in the sagittal plane. Last week’s blog looked at pelvic positioning belts which when correctly positioned can assist in pelvic stability.

Once the pelvis is stabilised, we can look to the trunk. For individuals that present with spinal asymmetry, when the posterior of the trunk is supported with appropriate contouring, we often find that the lateral supports don’t have to ‘work as hard’ resulting in less force being required.

For manual wheelchair users the chair configuration can also assist with Proximal stability;  “When a person has paralysis, hypotonia, incomplete motor coordination, an amputation, fatigue, impaired sitting balance, and they are unable to use their hip, thigh and trunk muscles for balance, the wheelchair or the seating system must do it for them. Seat slope creates that passive pelvic stability through the configuration of the wheelchair which allows the person to have better upper extremity function and endurance to perform their daily tasks.” (see Permobil USA Blog for more information on how seat slope and ergonomic seat can assist with proximal stability )

For power wheelchair users, proximal stability can assist in better control in chair operation. Arm rests should be at a height that stabilises the forearm with the shoulder in a neutral position; it is harder for many users to have fine motor control when the shoulder is abducted. If you have good proximal stability and the capacity for independent mobility but still struggling to control the mobility base, then consideration should initially look at a centre-mounted joystick position. This enables further stability of the more proximal shoulder and elbow joints, sometimes you may need to consider alternative access methods.



If you want more information on seating and positioning or mobilising wheelchairs, please contact me or alternatively Rachel, as Clinical Education Specialists we are here to assist you in ongoing educational opportunities including webinars, workshops, courses and one-on-one support. If you found this blog useful please feel free to share the link with others and sign up so you don’t miss future ones.





Restraint or Enabler...Part of the prescription or an afterthought?


Over the past decade the debate has continued around the world…is a pelvic belt a restraint and therefore classified as a restrictive practice? Or is it part of the seating solution supporting functional postural positioning? This week we will look at the definitions of restrictive practice, restraint and the functions of pelvic belts.

Within the clinical reasoning process of a seating assessment, we need to identify points of control. If we consider the movements of the pelvis in the coronal plane we know that a neutral or a slight Anterior Pelvic Tilt (APT) is a more functional position than Posterior Pelvic Tilt (PPT). When a belt is applied to assist in maintaining a neutral position, we refer to this as a postural support, therapeutic support, (note the word support) or an enabler because by providing support we are enabling function.



With the pelvis as the foundation think about how we can successfully increase distal ability…by providing proximal stability! It is also important to understand these types of supports and postural needs so that this can be appropriately explained to our clients. They can then make an informed choice around their equipment options.

Pelvic positioning belts are often seen as being a safety belt, this is likely due to the use of seat belts in motor vehicles. In a motor vehicle the belt is a restraint, its sole purpose is to restrain someone in the seat in an accident. If a wheelchair is being used as a seat in a motor vehicle for travel the positioning belt does not negate the requirement of a seat belt in the vehicle. They each have a different purpose!

“Restrictive practices are defined as any type of support or practice that limits the rights or freedom of movement for a person with a disability”. There are 6 types of restrictive practices recognised:

• Seclusion
• Mechanical
• Chemical
• Physical
• Psycho-social
• Environmental

We will now focus on the two areas of restrictive practice that are often referred to with the application of pelvic belts – physical and mechanical.

• A physical restraint is the use or action of physical force to prevent, restrict or subdue movement      of a person’s body, or part of their body, for the primary purpose of influencing their                    behaviour. (

• This is when something is put on a person to stop or make it harder for the person to move or to       control their behaviour.

• Sometimes a device is put on a person to help them to move or to stay healthy. This is called a          ‘Therapeutic Device’. This type of device is OK as it can help reduce pain, improve health or help        the person do an activity.



It is OK to use a therapeutic device when a health professional like a doctor or occupational therapist has approved it. The person with disability also needs to say it is OK. (Voluntary Code of Practice for the Elimination of Restrictive Practices – Disability Services Commission / WA Government)


Both definitions relate to behaviour and if being used in this way they meet the definition of restrictive practice. So, when is a pelvic belt a restraint and when is it an enabler…?


Ask yourself the following question:




We know that there are facilities out there that have very stringent restrictive practice policies that continue to impact on the prescription of a therapeutic support. It is still crucial that if you have identified the need for a positioning support, that you own it! Don’t include the recommendation based on being told that the facility has a restrictive policy and will not allow belts. Best practice indicates that you still make the recommendation and document the reasons how it will enhance function.

If you want more information on positioning supports, we offer educational workshops on seating and positioning and are always available to help you. Feel free to contact me at



Tracee-lee Maginnity
Clinical Education Specialist

Tracee-lee Maginnity joined Permobil Australia/New Zealand in July 2019, as a clinical education specialist. She graduated Auckland University of Technology with a BHSc (Occupational Therapy) in 2003 and has since worked in various roles related to seating and mobility including assessing, prescribing and educating.

Tracee-lee is passionate about maximising functional outcomes with end users and the importance of education within the industry.


A Thief Gave Me The World




This week we're pleased to feature Robbie Vance and his uplifting account of how getting his power wheelchair opened the door to opportunities and helped him recover many parts of his life that facioscapulohumeral (FSH) muscular dystrophy had taken away. 


I fought it. The symbol of weakness sat by itself in the guest room where I never went. Whenever I struggled to walk past the door, I purposefully averted my eyes, looking down or away. I did anything I could to avoid dealing with the wheelchair the young guy delivered in October of 2007. It was an ominous sign of my fading independence that I hated both for its invasion of my house and what it stood for.

My thirtieth birthday came just days before the chair became my unwelcome roommate. From the time I was a six-year-old playing tee ball, facioscapulohumeral (FSH) muscular dystrophy had been stealing from me. It started by stealing my ability to run and play like the other kids. Then, it stole my ability to raise my hand over my head to be recognized in class. It took my ability to get up off the ground when I would trip and fall. I tripped and fell more often because it stole my balance and my ability to pick up my feet sufficiently when I walked. It stole my self-confidence through the embarrassment that resulted from my public displays of physical awkwardness. It stole my ability to climb stairs followed by my ability to get up out of a chair without great effort. It stole my desire to go places in public like restaurants or movies where I was sure everybody would be pointing at me and whispering to their friends about the crippled guy. It took my ability to fit in, to go somewhere and not be noticed, to not be viewed with fear or pity, to not be the guy that people are afraid to approach, to not be assumed to be mentally challenged because I can’t do the Macarena. 

Before going out into the world, I did a cost-benefit analysis of the calculated risks and levels of reward. Whatever I wanted or needed basically had to be accessible from my truck window or it had to come to me. I would only go to work or to visit friends and family where I knew there wouldn’t be any major impediments to my limited mobility. If I needed food, it was delivered, came from a drive thru, or I would go to Mom’s kitchen across town. These limitations caused me to gain a good bit of weight, unfortunately. Eating mostly fast food and pizza, coupled with my inability to exercise, exacerbated a vicious cycle where the extra weight made it harder to get around which made me exercise less which made me gain weight and on and on.

I rarely let anyone take my picture or videotape me. If I didn’t have to see my physical awkwardness, I wouldn’t be reminded of it, and I wouldn’t have to deal with it. But inevitably, I would trip and fall or something else embarrassing would happen, and the reality of my diminished physical capabilities would kick me squarely in the jaw.

While the necessary daily activities like getting out of bed and getting dressed for work got more and more difficult for me as the days, months, and years passed, I tried not to let it show. I was fiercely independent and pressed my insistence to remain independent much further than I probably should have. I should have been using my chair a long time before I did, but it sat in my guest room for the first few months after being delivered, being used for nothing more than the infuriating target of my disdain, the harbinger of my inevitable future as a helpless cripple. I should have taken many other steps to deal more realistically with my needs much earlier than I did, but I was hard-headed, as is the case with many in my red-bearded Irish lineage.

The first time I used my chair in public was on December 29, 2007. It was a cold, clear day with a stiff breeze blowing from the northwest and swirling through the Liberty Bowl stadium in Memphis. Dad and I drove up for the late afternoon kick off to see our alma mater, Mississippi State, beat the University of Central Florida in the first bowl game I’d ever been to and the first football game I’d been to since I was in grad school.

The temperature nose-dived as the sun dropped below the rim of the stadium, and the game didn't provide much of a distraction from the spreading frostbite as it was a real snoozer. Despite not being able to feel my feet or lower legs, I had a great time just being somewhere new, and I even hated my wheelchair a little less than I did before we left home that morning. It was the first time I’d been able to get around without struggling and exhausting myself in a good many years.

My football outing changed my attitude toward my inanimate roomie. While I wasn’t ready to be friends just yet, I didn’t want to shove a grenade in its figurative tailpipe ether. Progress is progress. Right?

In January 2009, I received a promotion at work, and one of my new job responsibilities was to organize a meeting involving the Governor and a few other high-level elected state officials. This meeting was to take place in February in the Governor’s conference room, which was in a building a few hundred yards away from my office. It was too far for me to walk, and parking near the building wasn’t abundant. So, I decided it was time to bust out the new ride and roll in my office like I didn’t give one single damn what anybody thought about me showing up in a chair. 

All it took was that one day to change my outlook, and not just on the chair that I’d come to view with apprehension—already a step up from it being the vile demon waiting to steal everything that FSH hadn’t already absconded with. That day, the world opened up to me with opportunities abounding. I began exploring the places that I’d been unable to go on foot like the local Braves minor league ballpark, restaurants that don’t serve food in waxed paper, Styrofoam, and cardboard, college football games at my alma mater, concerts, dates, and most anywhere else you can think of—except shopping. I still prefer online shopping. #freeshipping

Last summer I sat down in my 3rd power chair, an all-black Permobil F5 Corpus VS that is by far the most comfortable seat I’ve ever owned. Then, a few weeks later, I did the most out of character thing I’ve ever done, and I thoroughly enjoyed every second of it. I took a trip to Nashville to visit Permobil and have my photo taken for their new website. I rode 7+ hours to Nashville to do the one thing I liked doing less than just about everything else in life. Over the course of the four days I was there, I got to meet and make friends with lots of great people and have my photo taken by a fantastically talented professional photographer who managed to accentuate my positives while cropping out most everything that made me uncomfortable about myself. It was not only a fun trip and a much need vacation from my everyday life, it was one of the most therapeutic activities I can remember and had a profound effect on my self-image.


Despite my fears, being in a chair has helped me recover many parts of my life from the FSH, instead of taking what was left. I’ll be 40 next month and even though the FSH is still progressing in ways predictable and otherwise, I’m thankful for every day I get to spend on the sunny side of the dirt. I don’t know what’s ahead, but I can’t wait to find out. I just hope it has a ramp.








Client Centred or Funding Dictated? 



Over the past couple months, we have been discussing power wheelchairs. We covered everything from drive wheel configuration to power seat functions and even the integrated technology like Bluetooth. I hope that you were able to learn one or two new facts throughout this time. What happens now? As we move onto the next topic series, I first wanted one more blog to really discuss why this all matters. It is easy to read a blog and then just continue on with our busy days. Do we take the time to read and really think about how our clients can be impacted by the equipment they receive?

This can be a hard discussion to have or to even think about. For many and most countries around the world, we talk about the idea of client-centred care. This means that we are completing our treatments, planning our goals, and prescribing equipment around the client. This is what most of us discussed and learned in our university. However, often we find that we are limited in this client centred approach. What is this limitation? FUNDING! Every country that I have lived in, worked in, or visited have all had the same barrier – Funding. We can allow funding to take over this client-centred approach and it then turns into the funding guiding our decisions on what is best for our client. Why does this matter? Our founder of Permobil perfectly answered this question so many years ago:

Every person has the right to have his or her disability compensated as far as possible by aids with the same technical standard as those we all use in our everyday lives.



So, does funding have it all wrong? No, this is not a blog to be negative to any funding. We have to remember that funding is guided by a LOT of different pieces. Some of these pieces we cannot change. However, when appropriate we can discuss and demonstrate how important it is to build and design the equipment to the client versus fitting the client into funding. This also means that we can demonstrate to our funding bodies/systems how client centred prescribing can lead to improved outcomes, increased function, increased independence, and an improved quality of life.

Many funding systems will allow the therapist to write an assessment or justification to explain why a piece of equipment is necessary if it is outside of the normal funding amount, code, or list. This can be overwhelming to many therapists to write this justification and for many good reasons. Sometimes we can be aware of the improvements in a client’s function, independence, medical benefits, but we are unable to understand how the equipment is making this change. Power wheelchairs, seating products, manual wheelchairs, they are all complex. A high-quality product is designed utilising the highest amount of research, an understanding of materials, and engineering principles. You might understand that one power wheelchair is easier for the client to maintain their position over uneven terrain versus another, but are you able to discuss how this can be related to the suspension, seating components, and their drive wheel configuration? This is where the challenge can come. How as therapists are we supposed to understand both our clients and the equipment to this high degree? As you continue to prescribe equipment this will become easier and you will continue to learn, but in the beginning remember that you have resources to help!

Reach out to your mentors, educators, manufacturers, etc… to help provide you with this information that you need. Ask the questions! There is so much information and research out there to help explain why your client might benefit from a certain function or design of their equipment.

The final thought I want to end on is to keep pushing. We have to remember how far we have come and that we have to continue to keep pushing for our clients. If we do not attempt to ask for funding on equipment that we believe is justified in improving our client’s lives, then we will never see a change in the funding. The funding system needs to hear that what they are funding is not always enough when that is the case. They may not be aware of new features and new technology and how this impacts your client. Unless you write a justification or assessment to tell the funding system that your client requires something different, we cannot blame them for not funding it. Remember to appeal too! Perhaps your first attempt did not fully explain why this equipment is necessary. If you get a denial, think about if this equipment is necessary to your client. If the answer is yes, go back to your resources, gather more information, and try to explain this again. If we do not appeal a denial, then we are essentially agreeing that this equipment is not necessary for our clients. I know this can be overwhelming at times, but remember we are here to help!

New Zealand Therapists!

I will be travelling across New Zealand at the end of November to come and talk about power wheelchairs and how the design and technology can impact our clients’ lives. Reach out to your local territory sales manager if you are interested in attending the event near you! You can always reach out to me directly at



Why Switch from Switch Control?



Mouse Emulation on an iPad?  Moving a cursor on a screen on an iPhone?  Did I just read that correctly?  Yes, you did!

When Apple release iOS 13 in September, in addition to new Memojis, an amazing new accessibility function was also released, which gives consumers who prefer Apple products more choice as to how they interact with their device (consult Apple to find out if your device is compatible with iOS 13)

Prior to this release, options for a person using either direct access or indirect access through Permobil iDevice, they were required to use Switch Control to navigate their icons, menus, and advanced scroll functions.

The best thing about this update, is that those who prefer Switch Control can still use this access method while trying out the new mouse emulation to see which is the most effective or efficient for them. The decision could depend on a few factors: drive input, wheelchair or external switch access methods, range of motion, strength, activity tolerance, what types of activities they will be completing with their phone or tablet, and of course, their individual preference.  

Now, there is a choice!  Consumers can now choose if they would like to use mouse emulation instead when using an adaptive Bluetooth mouse, such as the one that come standard on a Permobil PJSM or CJSM joystick, or OMNI2 display. 


To use and explore this great Apple Accessibility function with your Permobil Bluetooth mouse here are a few instructions.

Contact Rachel Fabiniak, your Permobil Clinical Educator, at for any Permobil questions.


 Download iOS 13 to your iPad/iPhone and make sure Bluetooth is turned on

  1.  Settings->Accessibility->Physical and Motor
  2.  Touch->AssistiveTouch->ON
  3.  Pointer Devices-> Devices->Bluetooth Devices 
  4. Tap Bluetooth Mouse 1

              a. You can change the cursor speed, size, and color

              b. You can also use dwell click

              c. Show onscreen keyboard

              d. Always show menu

              e. Can customise assistive touch menu








1      On your joystick, go to settings (push and hold top left button) and Turn Bluetooth

        Mouse 1 "ON”

2      Exit settings

3      Toggle to Bluetooth Mode

4      Place joystick into pairing mode (>>>>>)

5      Bluetooth Mouse 1 will appear on your phone’s BT menu.


Learn more here:


Call for accessibility support

 To contact Apple Accessibility Support over the phone in English, use these numbers:

  •          Australia: (61) 1-300-365-083
  •          United States: 1-877-204-3930
  •          United Kingdom: 0800 107 6285





Jennith Bernstein


Permobil US Clinical Educator Manager



Jennith Bernstein, PT, DPT, ATP/SMS: Jennith is a Physical Therapist based in Atlanta, Georgia.  She spent 10 years at The Shepherd Center, focusing her time in the Seating & Wheeled Mobility clinic for 7 years. Jennith completed her Masters in Physical Therapy at North Georgia College & State University and return to complete her transitional DPT at University of Texas Medical Branch in 2014.   Jennith has served as a volunteer teacher at the Universidad Mariano Galvez in Guatemala, instructing spinal cord injury curriculum as well as seating and mobility.  Jennith has presented at national and international conferences such as RESNA, ISS, LASS, Expo Ortopedica, and the APTA NEXT conference. Jennith joined Permobil as the Clinical Education Manager for the Central Region in 2016.